Skip to main content

Conquistadores



While everyone has undoubtedly been following the turbulent swings of the state of the (worldwide) economic crisis, there is a smaller yet albeit important battle being waged far from the trading rooms of the New York and London stock exchanges. Along the sandy and scorched earth that separates the U.S. and Mexican border, a turf war is taking place across certain border cities (on the Mexican side) that by all accounts has become as violent as Iraqi street battles that plagued that country from 2004-2006. With local police turning up killed, mutilated, and sometimes decapitated, horrendous crimes are taking place against anyone who dares stand against the drug lords. Controlling the smuggling routes which traffic the vast majority of cocaine which comes into this country, these kingpins are incredibly well funded, and sadly, well armed.

For a long period of time, there wasn't much the Mexican or American governments could accomplish, until now. In early March, Felipe Calderon, Mexico's President ordered massive number of federal police, or "federales" as they are colloquially known, into the most volatile city there is, Ciudad Juarez. Not dissimilar from the "surge" of troops the U.S. injected into Baghdad in 2007, this influx of over more than 7,500 police units, that are not as willing or able to be bought off as the local police, is designed to take back territory that is literally in the hands of drug smugglers and their well equipped muscle. The irony in this is that Cuidad Juarez literally borders El Paso across the Rio Grande river, and typically when lower tier countries (come on guys, face the facts) border more wealthy and prosperous ones, its typically the border area which is most positively influenced (the vast majority of Canada's population lives within 100 miles of the U.S. border). The problem with this scenario however, is that because the U.S. is the worlds largest consumer of Cocaine, the money and power goes to those willing to smuggle the product in, and this has made many of the Mexican cities that border the U.S. increasingly dangerous.

Therefore, as loathe as I am to admit this, Secretary of State Clinton was correct in her observation last week that the violent situation persists because both parties are at fault. Mexico has failed to assert control over its territory against drug lords, and America's penchant for blow has funded much of the mayhem. Aside from the fact that its true, it was also important to share blame in this situation, if nothing else to show solidarity with the Mexican government, a government by which all accounts has only become truly democratic within the past 2 decades. While our friends to the south have been somewhat reluctant to cooperate fully (they have rejected the notion of joint border patrols), serious help in this situation was direly needed, before the violence potentially spread onto our side of the border.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Deep State Blues

Late Monday evening, Deputy Director of the FBI Andrew McCabe announced he was leaving his position effective immediately, somewhat earlier than he had initially disclosed, as he was scheduled to leave sometime mid March. Although somewhat of a surprise, McCabe's departure from the FBI means different things to different people.  Democrats and proponents of the Russia collusion story are taking this as a sign that DJT has his new FBI director Christopher Wray are forcing McCabe out. However big of a stink the opposition can make, a President is within his legal right to put in his team into the Department of Justice, regardless the importance of the position, as it is part of the Executive branch.  That being said, it is important to note McCabe is not being fired, he is resigning from his post.  What makes this newsworthy is the timing.  Hours after McCabe announced he was leaving, the House Intelligence Committee voted along party lines to release an internal ...

Biggest Drain on the Species (3rd Edition)

BDOTS is here ladies and gentlemen! Just to refresh anyone's memory who may have forgot exactly how BDOTS (Biggest Drain on the Species) works, the award is given to an individual who's actions/comments are so blatantly hypocritical and self serving, this person is no longer just a detriment to the overall societal fabric, but an obstruction to the advancement of all human kind, and do I have a good one for you today. So good, in fact, that I am going to write to our candidate directly in hopes he may yet read this. Howard Dean, you have been a great sound bite ever since the 2004 presidential campaign. After your colossal campaign collapse, the Democratic National Party liked what it saw in your "grass roots" style, in which you employed eager volunteers with some new invention called the internet, resulting in a fairly effective money raising machine, and gave you the nod as the new DNC leader. Evidently, the DNC must have also liked the complete ineffectiveness...

Speaking of the Louse (Part 2)

This story just keeps getting better and better. Dec. 12, 2007: "On one occasion, in the fall of 2002, I was briefed on interrogation techniques the administration was considering using in the future. The administration advised that legal counsel for the both the CIA and the Department of Justice had concluded that the techniques were legal. I had no further briefings on the techniques...Jane Harman was briefed more extensively and advised the techniques had in fact been employed." Feb. 25, 2009: "No. No the fact is, they did not brief, well first of all, we're not allowed to talk about what happens there, but I can say they did not brief us with these enhanced interrogations that were taking place. They did not brief us. They were talking about an array of interrogations taht they might have at their disposal. But I can say flat out, they never told us that these enhacement interrogations were being used." April 23, 2009: "It is not appropriate f...