Skip to main content

I keep my friends close, and my enemies.....



...a little closer.

Before getting started I'd like to say sorry for the extended hiatus, between the never ending hoopla surrounding the current state of the economy and the never ending senate races in Minnesota and Georgia, there really hasn't been much to discuss. Having said that, congratulations on your re-election Senator Chambliss, and may Al Franken only prolong this embarrassing conflict to his own disgrace.

On to our soon to be Secretary of State, Senator Clinton. A few days after the election, President-elect Obama went on 60 minutes and said that he had been reading a lot of Abraham Lincoln's memoirs, and that he was gaining a lot of insight on how to govern as a President for all the people. Kudos to the President. Considering he has asked, and that Bob Gates has acquiesced to his request to stay on as Secretary of Defense, I applaud the new President's judgement. There is not a more qualified man for the job, and it indeed matches the President's campaign rhetoric to be bi-partisan. Indeed, Obama's appointments for his economic team is a veritable intellectual's all star team.

However, the appointment of Senator Clinton to be Secretary of State is well, somewhat suspect. Disregarding the vitriol that was exchanged earlier this year between the two campaigns (who can forget an Obama staffer referring to Mrs. Clinton as a "monster"), the two have had incredibly dissimilar views regarding America's role in the world. On the foreign policy front, Senator Clinton has been more conservative in just about every aspect possible. From her championing the case for the war in Iraq, to her inability to apologize for her vote for said war during the highly partisan Democratic primaries, the two have not seen eye to eye on many fronts. This is sure to erk many of Obama's supporters on the left. Clearly, appointing a 2 term senator and former first lady who has a profane amount of Washington connections isn't exactly matching his vow to change "politics as usual in Washigton." In fact, it seems only to perpetuate it.

So, how does one examine this through the looking glass. Initially, it was pragmatic, President Obama seems to be placating a large and sincere portion of the Democratic party, after all, 18 million people did vote for Mrs. Clinton in the primaries. Also, there are little people with more diplomatic "street cred" on the international scene than Mrs. Clinton, she will carry enormous weight wherever she travels. Looking further through the microscope, this decision might also signify some confidence issues within President Obama himself. Between selecting a international relations "guru" in Joe Biden for Vice-President is one thing, but to appoint another heavy-weight and former rival as Secretary of State might show some subconscious chinks in the armor.

However, and this is my gut feeling Machiavellian to the T, he is doing it to keep an eye on her. Much as Lincoln did, Mr. Obama is appointing many former rivals to important positions. After all, Mrs. Clinton did say on the campaign trail that Senator McCain would bring a lot to the White House while Senator Obama, "had a nice speech." Talk about largesse on the part of President Obama.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Deep State Blues

Late Monday evening, Deputy Director of the FBI Andrew McCabe announced he was leaving his position effective immediately, somewhat earlier than he had initially disclosed, as he was scheduled to leave sometime mid March. Although somewhat of a surprise, McCabe's departure from the FBI means different things to different people.  Democrats and proponents of the Russia collusion story are taking this as a sign that DJT has his new FBI director Christopher Wray are forcing McCabe out. However big of a stink the opposition can make, a President is within his legal right to put in his team into the Department of Justice, regardless the importance of the position, as it is part of the Executive branch.  That being said, it is important to note McCabe is not being fired, he is resigning from his post.  What makes this newsworthy is the timing.  Hours after McCabe announced he was leaving, the House Intelligence Committee voted along party lines to release an internal ...

Biggest Drain on the Species (3rd Edition)

BDOTS is here ladies and gentlemen! Just to refresh anyone's memory who may have forgot exactly how BDOTS (Biggest Drain on the Species) works, the award is given to an individual who's actions/comments are so blatantly hypocritical and self serving, this person is no longer just a detriment to the overall societal fabric, but an obstruction to the advancement of all human kind, and do I have a good one for you today. So good, in fact, that I am going to write to our candidate directly in hopes he may yet read this. Howard Dean, you have been a great sound bite ever since the 2004 presidential campaign. After your colossal campaign collapse, the Democratic National Party liked what it saw in your "grass roots" style, in which you employed eager volunteers with some new invention called the internet, resulting in a fairly effective money raising machine, and gave you the nod as the new DNC leader. Evidently, the DNC must have also liked the complete ineffectiveness...

Speaking of the Louse (Part 2)

This story just keeps getting better and better. Dec. 12, 2007: "On one occasion, in the fall of 2002, I was briefed on interrogation techniques the administration was considering using in the future. The administration advised that legal counsel for the both the CIA and the Department of Justice had concluded that the techniques were legal. I had no further briefings on the techniques...Jane Harman was briefed more extensively and advised the techniques had in fact been employed." Feb. 25, 2009: "No. No the fact is, they did not brief, well first of all, we're not allowed to talk about what happens there, but I can say they did not brief us with these enhanced interrogations that were taking place. They did not brief us. They were talking about an array of interrogations taht they might have at their disposal. But I can say flat out, they never told us that these enhacement interrogations were being used." April 23, 2009: "It is not appropriate f...